Skip to content

Category: Uncategorized

By Sarah Glassmeyer - Thursday, September 17, 2009 - 8:43pm

We have two law journals here at UK Law.  The Kentucky Law Journal and the Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture and Natural Resources Law (KJEANRL).   The name of the second is admittedly a mouthful and a very recent change, made in part to broaden the types of articles published.  Now that a new name and focus have been settled on, the editorial staff is expanding upon traditional types of legal scholarship and publishing a companion blog to their journal.

From the blog description:

The Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture & Natural Resources Law Blog is an interactive blog providing legal scholars, practitioners and students a worldwide forum to discuss compelling issues in equine, agricultural and natural resources law. Responses to articles, notes and comments published in the print copy of KJEANRL are strongly encouraged. Additionally, the blog provides abstracts of articles, notes and comments published in the predecessors to KJEANRL, the Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law and the Journal of Mineral Law & Policy.

I think that’s a really neat idea and a great way to turn traditional scholarship more 2.0 and interactive.  Does anyone know of other law journals doing this?

blogs, hve, Uncategorized
By Sarah Glassmeyer - Sunday, August 30, 2009 - 3:32pm

I’m starting to wonder how  many times I can say to myself “…so that happened.” in a week.

I’ve just survived my first week of the fall semester.  And if you’re one of my students reading this, let me assure you that the first week back transition is just as hard on law school faculty and staff as it is on you. I’ve had tons of ILLs to process, longer Reference Desk hours, lectures to prepare (oh, yeah, turns out I will be teaching 1L legal research this fall…there’s some sturm und drang about that too, but I”ll wait until another post to talk about the *dramatic pause* laptop ban) and welcoming receptions to attend, all while trying to navigate through a town/campus who’s population seemingly quadrupled in 24 hours.

Adding to the drama of the week, on Monday Westlaw sent out an advertisement aimed at lawyers with the headline “Are you on a first name basis with the librarian?” And then goes on to say, “If so, chances are you are spending too much time at the library.  What you need is fast, reliable research you can access right in your office.  And all it takes is West.”  Screnshot here.

As my Grandpa Heller would say, that went over like a lead Zepplin with the librarian crowd.

There was outrage and pearl clutching on Law-Lib and twitter about it.  I tried to not make too many comments until I saw the actual ad or heard an official response from West but I did get a screen grab of the ad and posted it on Twitter/twitpic in the interest of sharing information. You can’t imagine how freaked out I was to keep seeing “mentions” notifications on Tweetdeck with people all over the country retweeting it and then adding their own commentary. For the record, I never said Westlaw “sucked” or “was evil.”  (Also, at about the 400th view of the pic, I noticed that the other two pictures visible were of me and a squirrel and me and the Butter Cow at the Ohio State Fair.  *sigh* Professionalism! I haz it! )  So, anyway, it turns out it was in fact a real ad, and West feels terribly about hurting our feelings.

Well, okay then!

I’ve mentioned before that I have complicated feelings about the vendor/librarian relationship.  I personally try to not accept vendor swag but I don’t think less of my librarian compatriots that do.  I don’t think that Wexis are evil, nor do I think that there’s anything wrong with running a for-profit business. I do wonder why we rely on commercial vendors for information that tax dollars have already paid for and how much profit is “enough” when libraries and law firms are facing massive budget cuts.

As I tell my Legal Research students, I think of Lexis and Westlaw as the Crips and Bloods of Legal Information.  They’re in it to make money.  And, like drug dealers, they’ll give you the first taste for free while you’re in law school in hopes that you get hooked.  But they’re also engaged in a to-the-death battle with each other over the finite customer base and if any one was clearly better than the other, the other would cease to exist. (And if you think I’m mistaken about the battle part, how many people got sent the West ad by their Lexis rep? )  So, basically, keep your eyes open and try to not be a casualty in the war…look out for yourself.

There’s always going to be tensions between librarians and vendors, especially as they expect people to pay for things that we want to give away for free. (There’s another analogy here that I keep coming back to, but there are some things that even I won’t put in print.)  Here’s the thing…they’re not on our side, they’re not our enemies…we’re all just pieces of the same puzzle.  And as soon as we get rid of worrying about being offended by them or always having to play defense or expecting them to kiss our rings for allowing them access to our patrons, we can start thinking about the future.  I really like the ideas that Meg and Tom put out earlier in the week about the West ad issue.   There are some concrete steps that law librarians, as individuals, can take and things to think about with regards to vendors and the role of librarians.

For better or worse, AALL is currently the major unified voice for law librarians.  If you’re unhappy with the vendor/librarian relationship, perhaps  AALL can be used as a conduit.

(Okay, Gentle Reader, I’m sure bitter laughter just rang out amongst some of you.  I know lots of people that I respect and like have major issues with AALL.  Personally, they haven’t really done me dirty yet, so I’m trying to keep an open mind.  I’ll try to work for change within the system, and if that fails, I’ll go outside of it.  I have no problem with going outside of the system and being a lone wolf and in many ways it’s easier, but maybe not as effective or fast.  Like I said, right now AALL has the body count of law librarians that makes it the best bet to effect change.  Refusing West’s funding for the Annual Meeting becaues they wouldn’t give up pricing information was a great start.  So I’m hopeful, but in the meantime I’ll also keep paying my dues to SLA and the Legal and Academic Divisions.  BUT I DIGRESS…)

Perhaps not coincidentally, in the middle of the West brou-ha-ha on Law-Lib, there was a brief message about AALL beginning the process of revising and planning for new stratgic directions for 2010-2013 since the current 2005-2010 strategic directions expire next year.  They’ve set up a blog for AALL membership to add its comments.  There are three questions that are asked:

  1. How do we seize the moment and make it our own?
  2. Where do we, as law librarians, want to be in the next three years?
  3. What is required of us to create the world we envision?

Okay, those are really broad questions.  And yes, generally “strategic directions” and “mission statements” and things of that sort are often just “feel good” messages that aren’t easily transitioned into action and otherwise set off my BS meter.  But maybe they don’t need to be.  Respond to this call for input.  Add concrete ideas.   I need to think more before I figure out exactly how I want to answer these questions.  When I do figure out what I want to say, I’ll definitely post my answer here and there.  I encourage you to do the same.

aall, hve, Uncategorized, vendors
By Sarah Glassmeyer - Monday, August 24, 2009 - 12:26pm

As many of you know, part of my gig here at UK is to manage the Interlibrary Loan operations for the law library.  And by “manage”, I mean do it all.   It’s a lot of work, but I enjoy most of it.  And occasionally, it reaps some fun rewards.

Today I pulled and copied an article from Trial Magazine.  As I was flipping through it, my eye was caught by an advertisement.  BEHOLD, THE FUTURE OF LEGAL RESEARCH (um, circa 1982)

lexis0001

Some time, when I have the time, I’d love to go through all of our back issues of practitioner magazines and scan in these old adverts and post them on the web.

hve, Uncategorized
By Sarah Glassmeyer - Sunday, August 2, 2009 - 4:50pm

I’ve been trying to wrap my head around AALL 2009 and figure out what I want to say and how I want to say it.  It’s appearing that it’s not going to happen, at least not before I forget something important.  There are some things I really need to cover and explain, but there’s a chance my discovery of guacomole may get equal footing to Lawberry Camp.  So please forgive me, Gentle Reader, because this entry is going be a bit disjointed.

Contents

Lawberry Camp
Cool Kids
Guacomole
Vendor Relations
AALL Secrets
So! Many! People!
Rush…rush..
Looking forward to #aall2010

Lawberry Camp

Going into #aall2009, Lawberry Camp was pretty much taking up most of my brainpower and emotions, more so than the talk I was going to give, the socialization requirements that always freak me out, and my general fear of plane travel.  I was stressed out, yo.  (Correlation does not imply causation, but in the past two weeks, I have found about a dozen grey hairs. I’m just sayin’…) Right up until the 3pm start time, I couldn’t believe it was going to happen. I thought no one would show up, or we’d get kicked out of the room, or people would show up and no one would talk.

I’m pleased to report that I’m pretty sure Lawberry Camp was a success.  People showed up, they talked, everyone seemed to have a fruitfull conversation, and I heard plenty of nice comments about it afterwards.  It was all sort of a blur for me (especially now, 8 days later), but Jason and I wrote an article for the Capitol Crier describing it a little bit. (Page 7)  We’re definitely going to bring it back for AALL 2010 in Denver, hopefully as an official all-day workshop, but in a more punk-rock way if need be.  If you have ideas about what you’d like to see, we’re crowdsourcing the planning on the wiki.

I also want to take this opportunity to thank my Lawberry Camp co-organizer Jason Eiseman. Planning an unconference is tricky…you need to have some things in place, but at the same time , given the nature of unconferences, you can’t do too much.  I don’t think I could have asked for a better partner than Jason.  Our skill sets really complimented each other and he always laughed at my jokes.  I don’t want to say that he’s renewed my faith in humanity, because let’s face it – that’s gone and never coming back , but he did renew my faith in teamwork and project partnerships, which is a big thing for a self-described “Lone Wolf” such as myself.  Not only did I get to have an awesome professional experience because of him, but I also gained a new friend.

The Cool Kids

Okay, two things I need to cover here…both the “cool kids” themselves and the borderline infamous “cool kids” badge ribbon.

As for the “cool kids” themselves, I am totally not going to try and name names because I will likely forget someone and frankly, I gots enough drama in my life.  Basically, it’s the cohort group I discovered at CaliCON09 which has expanded out some more.  It’s so much fun for me to finally find “my people” and it makes me really happy to know that I’ll be seeing them for years to come at AALLs – both for professional reasons and because they are a Hell of a lot of fun to hang out with.

While at CALIcon, someone jokingly suggested that we get badge ribbons for AALL that said “cool kids.”  Since I knew I would be getting some for Lawberry Camp, I volunteered to pick some up.  Okay, here’s thing…it was a joke that devolved from a random comment on Twitter at another conference.  We do not think we’re better than anyone else nor are we exclusionary. We just thought it was a funny way to punk the conference.

Badge ribbons are relatively inexpensive to order.  I highly suggest them!  They are great conversations starters (both at the conference and online), just pick a phrase that doesn’t cause someone to accost you in the middle of the Library of Congress. #awkward  There’s lots of funny suggestions at the FriendFeed link above.  Or just make one advertising your SIS or Caucus.

Guacamole

Guacamole is awesome. Why did it take me 33 years to figure this out?  Unfortunately, I think I may only like the type that is made tableside and costs $12/bowl. But look, Ma, I ate guacamole!

Vendor Relations

This one’s another twofer…

I only went into the exhibit hall twice.  Once to see the first prize drawing (although since I won an iPod last year, I’ll probably never win anything again), once to chat with a friend because I was nervous about  a meeting I had to go to and wanted a distraction.  But that’s pretty much it.   I actually would like to cruise the hall and see what the vendors have to offer (and no, I don’t mean swag…I have no use for that stuff really), but I simply don’t have time.  I wonder if, like last year, I’ll login Wexis tommorrow to see big changes that I could have learned about instead of being surprised.

I would love it if AALL returned to the four day schedule, but I’m guessing that this will only happen if the vendors call for it because we’re not visiting the exhibit hall.  I’m afraid, though, that so many of the #totebag brigade choose exhibit halls over meetings, that the effect of the shortened schedule is not noticable.

Part two of vendor relations involves the involvement of vendors in social media and other adverts….

As you my know, Gentle Reader, I set up a wiki for AALL 2009 for people to share info and connect prior to the annual meeting.  I included in it a Vendor Section because, even given my socialistic tendencies, I do realize that big annual meetings cannot happen without vendors and exhibitors paying a lot of the bills.   So providing a free space for them to hawk their wares was my way of saying “Thank you for making this experience barelyaffordable insteadof completely outside the realm of possibility”.

I was quite displeased to recieve a message from one of my correspondants alerting me to the fact that a vendor had put an advertisement on every page of the wiki.  I’m choosing to believe it was an honest mistake, but it still felt “gross” for lack of a better word. Later a vendor began to use the #coolkids hashtag, which felt, again “gross.”  After 4 days of conference travel and little sleep, I did not react to that as well as I might have hoped, but after exchanging some messages with all of the parties involved, I think the drama has been resolved.  I learned many things from this experience,  not the least of which was that I think I understand what students may feel like when they see a librarian on a social media site.

I guess I’m still trying to work out my feelings about vendors.  On one hand, they do provide a valuable services…I mean, if I can avoid digging through the Decennial Digests by running a few database searches, you bet your sweet bibby I am going to do that.  On the other, we pay dearly for these valuable services. Perhaps too dearly.  I mean, how much profit do they need to make? How is it we’ve allowed ourselves to essentially be cornered by two major vendors who provide information that’s technically free? (Yes, I know, we really pay mostly for the “value added” materials such as indexes and annotations.)

And then there’s the swag…I mean, I like pens.  They’re very useful to write with.  Do I need stress balls, binders, stuffed animals, mugs, etc.?  No. No I do not.  I guess given my above reservations about vendors, I feel weird accepting “toys” from them and participating in their advertising, either by getting my picture taken at their parties (and yes, I totally agreed to be interviewed by West and have it put up on their site, but (a) I’m not shilling West products and (b) the rational part of my brain shuts down when I hear “would you like to be interviewed and put on Internet?” so DONT JUDGE ME) or by accepting their swag.  I don’t know about y’all, but I would feel weird when a student asks me my opinion of Lexis vs. West (and I do get that question a lot), and I pause to sip out of a Wexis branded coffee mug before I answer.

AALL Secrets

Prior to AALL2009, someone set up an anoymous twitter account modeled on the ALASecrets one. I will neither confirm nor deny that I set it up, because pretty soon enough people will deny it and I want to respect the anonymity of everyone that partcipated.  I have to say though…compared to ALA secrets it was sort of boring.  Maybe because we are all connected to the legal field in one way or another we’re a little more circumspect in what we post on the Internet, even if it’s supposed to be anonymous. (Oh, and it turns out that it’s not as anoymous as one might have hoped.  The privacy holes were pointed out to me, but I’m not going to reveal them here. Hopefully whoever sets it up next year will close those holes.)  Or maybe it’s because Law Librarians aren’t as much of party animals as, say, an elementary school librarian who has 4 days to get their partying done for the year.

All in all, it was an interesting social experiment to watch from afar, but like I said, sort of boring. The only real drama to come out of it was some people deleted posts.  Again, I will neither confirm nor deny that I deleted posts NOR that I posted instructions on how to recovered deleted posts.  You know, let’s just pretend that I never metioned AALLSecrets at all.

So! Many! People!

As mentioned previously, I had an awesome time hanging out with the #coolkids.  But they weren’t the only people at the conference.  As much as it pained me to pull myself away from them, I did try and take Jason’s advice to mingle more outside of my comfort zone.  Besides, I have a lot of professional interests and there were some people I really wanted/needed to talk to. And it worked out for the best, because I have some great ideas as a result of these conversations.

I also remain amazed and perplexed that people come up to me and introduce themselves to me and seem excited by this fact.  Of course, I am borderline stalking a certain Southern Gentleman Scholar of Legal History and I’ve been trying to work up the nerve to introduce myself to him for YEARS and have yet to do so and I’m sure he would be surprised to learn this fact himself.  (I was going to say his name and link to his profile, but I had one of those  rare moments of wise decision making and self censorship, so let’s all take a moment and bask in that, shall we?)  Anyway, I guess since I spend most of my social networking/blogging activities either alone in my office or, like now, sitting on my couch, I forget that anyone actually reads these things and that the people I interact with really exist. (What? Some of you people could really be a dog and I’D NEVER KNOW!)  So, as I’ve said before, with my shyness and general feelings of social awkwardness,  it makes my conference experiences so much more pleasant to have a pre-connection with people.

Rush…rush

I alluded to it before, but I need to say it plainly…AALL, please take the Annual Meeting back to four days.  I simply cannot fit everything in that I need to in the current schedule.  And I’m not talking partying.  I mean, all of the required committee meetings, visiting with vendors, SIS and Caucus events and programs are just not physically possible in three days.

Looking Forward to #AALL2010

Oddly, it seemed that a lot of my conversations at AALL 2009 revolved around AALL 2010.  Like I already said, Lawberry Camp is coming back bigger and better.  I have, at last count, 9 program ideas I’m going to try and flesh out and propose. (That sounds like a lot, and it is, but (a) I’m not working on most of those alone (b) some of those ideas can be combined (c) at least one has absolutely no chance of getting accepted.)  But I hope to have at least one program in next year, aside from Lawberry Camp.

I’ve also figured out some things that I learned this year and/or need to remember for next year:

  • Wear comfortable shoes. Even more comfortable ones than the ones I currently rock.
  • Overpacking is okay, especially when weather delays cause your flights to be canceled and you have to spend an extra night in town.  Clean drawers, FTW!
  • It’s worth it to end your night a little early if it means you can function the next day. Made this mistake in Portland, now I don’t.  Still ended up averaging 3-4 hours a night.  MADNESS! The 3 day schedule is madness, I tell you!
  • I need to pack Powerbars, slimfast shakes, nuts, SOMETHING for a meal replacement because there were a couple days where I realized “Oh, hey, I haven’t had time to eat yet today…”  MADNESS, etc.
  • Just because no one else is volunteering project, that doens’t mean you have to. I’m all for being a good soldier and supporting the orgs and profession, but know your limits when it comes to activities.
hve, Uncategorized
By Sarah Glassmeyer - Saturday, June 20, 2009 - 10:54pm

I am 2 for 2 when it comes to awesome conference experiences this week. As I posted on both Twitter and Facebook, I feel like I’ve spent the past week at Library Nerd Camp….and that’s not a bad thing.

What to say about CALIcon…This was my first CALIcon and I wasn’t quite sure what to expect. In addition to librarians, there are IT professionals, instructional technologists, law professors and others involved in legal information in attendance at this conference. I mean, there were some hard-core tech geeks there and I already feel like such a poser when it comes to the computer stuff that I felt a little intimidated pre-conference. Also, long term attendees have an almost familial camaraderie and I was a little worried about “fitting in.” On top of this is my usual social anxiety about meeting new people and being in group situations.

As it turns out, I really needn’t have worried. Everyone was totally cool. I tried to break out of my comfort zone and mingle with some new people in addition to catching up with people I had previously met. In large part, I have Twitter to thank for this. Even with the people I don’t “talk” with regularly, I was able to put faces to names and I think they were able to do the same with me. (NTS: Bring the damn cat hat with you to your next conference.) I do want to emphasize again that if you don’t already, use a profile pic and/or tie your user name to your real name. I met someone at CALIcon and I didn’t realize that I had talked with them via Twitter a few times…after I made the connection, I felt much more relaxed around them. Having that pre-conference social media connection somehow made it easier for me to make it through those awkward first moments with someone because it felt like I had already done that already online.

It’s really funny how you can get an idea of what someone is like from your interaction with them via social media, but that’s can be totally divorced from how they are in “meat space.” I don’t want to name names and explain how people were different than what I was expecting. I will say, though, that everyone I met was totally delightful and that all surprises were pleasant ones. I hope everyone I met for the first time in real life feels the same about me. If not, let me once again reiterate the fact that I am actually very, very shy and I sometimes have a difficult time understanding what people are saying in crowd situations. I know that this can sometimes come off as stuck up – I’m really, really not. You just might have to take the initiative if you want to talk to me.

Twitter also played a really integral part in the conference itself. Since it’s a pretty small gathering, it was really easy to follow the #calicon09 tweets using Tweetchat. (Sometimes, at larger events like Computers in Libraries or SLA, it’s too hard to follow along.) Basically, this allowed one to double up on conference programming. Unfortunately, it also led to something I call twenvy…the feeling of dissatisfaction you get from realizing that another session is much more fun than the one you chose. Besides the reporting aspect of it, Twitter allows attendees to ask questions or “self annotate” the talks without distracting the other attendees. I heard a rumor that there were other, more private back channels, but I didn’t make the cut for those. I suppose I could have set up my own meebo room, but really, I find chat to be too distracting during conferences.

There were some really great sessions. Probably my favorite was the Electronic Casebook session on Saturday morning. I had heard part of this talk at SEAALL in April, and enjoyed it so much that I wanted to hear Prof Wiseman explain his project again. It was supplemented by a law prof from Nebraska who did a similar thing. I am still stunned by the 1.5 million dollar price tag estimate for casebooks per law school per semester. Law, given its caselaw pedagogy, provides such a perfect opportunity for expensive casebooks and supplements to be replaced by free electronic versions using open source tech and free government information…more than any other discipline, really. I was also really glad to see Kindles and Drupal demonstrated in person, although I’m not quite ready to drink the kool-aid with either of those two just yet. The full conference program and presentations can be viewed here.

As with SLA and CiL, the “LobbyCon” (and TwitterCon) was often just as informative and valuable as the prepared sessions. At the risk of missing some names, I really do want to mention the great times I had talking and hanging out with Meg Kribble, Tom Boone, Jason Eiseman and Roger Skalbeck.  (*fistbump*). I’m really excited about the fact that I feel like now I have a cohort of newer law librarians – all with different, yet complementary skill sets – to work on projects and hash out job issues with. (Too bad we got these darn day jobs taking up so much of our time…) And aside from the work stuff, they were just a lot of fun to be with. There were a few times at CALIcon that I laughed so hard I think I actually pulled muscles in my sides.

There was another unexpected, social/work benefit. I traveled to CALIcon with my director and the Head of IT for MPOW. We have a really great relationship anyway, but there’s something about the planes, trains and automobiles experience that bonds a group. Since there wasn’t too much to do while traveling, we talked over a lot of work issues and figured out some stuff. Perhaps we needed to get away from the office to see things in a new perspective. Or perhaps the lack of oxygen in Boulder helped to “expand our horizons.”

Aside from CALIcon, Boulder was great. I mean, my hotel was a bit divey, but you don’t get to attend as many conferences as I do on my travel budget and stay at the really nice places. (NTS: Say name of hotel out loud before booking room.) I coerced some people to drive me past the JonBenet Ramsey house. (I know, I know…I’m sort of ashamed of myself.) I visited an Apple Store for the first time ever. (I know, I know…I’m sort of ashamed of myself.) And I ate a lot of really unhealthy food and indulged in perhaps a few more adult beverages than is okay at that altitude (I know, I know…actually, you know what? I’m owning these.) And, finally, I became convinced that my netbook purchase was a wise one.

So that was my CALIcon. I’ll definitely be returning…hopefully next year I can come up with something to present on. One big thing to come out of it (and by “it” I mean the LobbyCon portion) is that there will be an unconference/library camp at AALL 2009, which is being coordinated by Jason Eiseman and myself.  It’s going to be on Saturday at 3 – 6 pm.  Stay tuned for details.

hve, Uncategorized